THE OBJECTIVE GOVERNANCE PARTYA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
For many years now there has been legal battles with parliament and the people on everything from human rights violations to the fallacy that is the right to lawful rebellion, the fact that the people are taking our own government to court is a principle that people should not have to contemplate.
The removal of legal aid to the most vulnerable in society at the same time as mass human rights violations from policies of parliament has to be looked at with a new sense of concern, because each person being hurt has a right not to be hurt, each dead person due to collective forced austerity had the right to life, they are dead.
Each victim of state protected child abuse in the ranks of our lords representatives politicians and peers have the right to justice, the use of the official secrets act to protect present past and future perpetrators of these offences from justice is a corruption of every sense of justice, this is an offence to every child abused, in the past, present and those who will be abused.One has to accept the fact that all of these are issues of criminality that is unpoliced.
Irrespective of political party or state apparatus, the fact is there are people committing these offences, not the system, THE SYSTEM is not broken, the people running it are unpoliced and out of control.
Their attitudes and priorities are so far from the will of the people it beggar’s belief, to any sane mind.Irrationality, such as collective punishment with austerity for the actions of the bankers (who robbed us all TWICE in four years) and the forced austerity when the people ordering the austerity knew it was not necessary or the collective punishment of the homeless for BEING homeless have to be viewed in realistic terms, calling all of these issues anything other than acts of wanton destruction of PEOPLE would be a tragedy of proportions the dead would be insulted, again.
This is the result of the people not being in control of other people we allow the honour of our authority.This is not political, religious, its not radical or fundamentalist, its about the authority of the people being abused across the board by other PEOPLE we employ to do a JOB.
Not people who will try and convince us that an “unwritten constitution” is real, how stupid do these people think we are…………….”an unwritten constitution” stupid.People run our country, not politics, people hurt people, not political ideologies, people caused these issues not metaphors or “organisations”, we the people need to control the people we employ to look after us all.jsa
(THE) OBJECTIVE GOVERNENCE PARTY (OGP)
The mandate of OGP is exactly what it says in the title, objective governance, governance of the people with the people’s objectives and not the subjective governance of political representation.
The day that parliament, the crown and the house of lords allowed the official secrets act to be used to protect offenders of innocent children, all three national institutions became unfit to govern.
This one act alone made all these institutions and the people employed therein nothing more than protagonists in the continued child abuse by members of their own ranks.Our governance in the 21st century must be different from the last two millennia; it must be different from the last 20 years.
Children in the 1960’s believed that the world would change for the better and the children of today are repeating the same pleas, as have generations of children irrespective of colour or religion.It is a sad fact that “political ideologies and theologies” have been corrupted by greed and wealth, but it has opened the eyes of a generation to the corruption and criminality that is the reality of political representation.
In order to simplify the difference between objective governance and the political governance of today is;The government have accepted that “they” have lost ten thousand children.
Our government have not had to answer where these children are now.Our government have not had to answer when these little kids are being returned or what is the government doing to find them.
Our oppositions parties are not kicking off.Objective governance would peruse the questions to their conclusions, our government ignore the issue and so does the opposition, the police, the judiciary etc, these children are missing, and no one in parliament cares.
The fact that no politician can be arrested over covering up child abuse by their colleagues makes our political establishment and the judiciary, unfit to differentiate between simple right and wrong.
The lack of responsibility, accountability and objectivity can be seen in the Brit exit fiasco, it takes years to make decisions on a simple divorce case, yet when those in parliament NEED a law or legislation passed to stop the nation leaving the EU it can be called into law in days.
Political parties from four nations screaming about different issues wanting one disproportionate union of four nations to leave another disproportionate union of 28, the irony is inescapable.
So, if we can all agree that “political governance” is unfit to govern, then an alternative must be found to replace the corruption that is political decisions based on finance or favours.A workable solution to the criminality in parliament and our institutions is a “house of representatives”, this will be explained as we go on.But for the moment let us consider the main parts of the ideology of objective governance;
The first issue OGP if elected by the good and honest people of the united kingdoms would be to make it government policy that; all elected political leaderships be held criminally responsible for the policies of their employees, who occupy places of trust and governance, if those policies harm or hurt those being governed.
That all political representatives of political parties be held criminally reasonable for their own actions and the actions of their colleagues if those actions harm or hurt those being governed.Reasons for policy; when the state introduced universal credit, it was on the understanding that this “was to save money on the benefits bill”The government own wording in the health directorate was, “people will be hurt but the hurt would be kept to a minimum”
MASS CHILD ABUSE PROTECTED BY THE OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT
The OGP will seek the assistance of an English-speaking foreign police force to investigate the last 30 years of child abuse in the ranks of our politicians and peers (and security and media services) and will turn over all child abuse cases under the official secrets act to this police force.
There are many cases of mass child abuse being covered up with the official secrets act, this means little kids are being buggered, raped and abused and no thought is being paid to the many thousands of victims of members of parliament, the BBC, house of lords and many national institutions like sport and the media as well as our churches, synagogues and mosques.
It is criminal to cover up child abuse with one’s official status and office and it will be retrospectively treated as such.
There are many complicated laws to stop child abuse and trafficking, they don’t work, child abuse isn’t stopping, it is getting worse and to the point it is practically accepted as “just par for the course”.
There was no banking crisis, it was robbery, theft, fraud, deception, it was a series of criminal offences on open markets by bankers and financiers who gambled the nations money away and then stole our monies and used our savings and insurances as well as our pension pots to pay their debts.
The government used taxes to replace the stolen money and yet more taxes to pay the rest of the criminality, like the fraudulence of the Ppi’s.These same bankers reformatted the same Ppi swindle within four years and our government had to bail them out again with more tax money.
The resulting effect of no taxes left to run the country means that the government are now borrowing trillions of pounds over the next few years off these same bankers to run our country.
Our taxes to pay for services, the NHS, our kids futures etc are all going into paying bankers, the same banks who keep robbing us and parliament keep letting away with it.
Then the government FORCE austerity on to the country because the banks told our government “if you don’t reduce borrowing, we will stop giving you loans to run the country”.Our national consent was not asked for over these banking crimes, it was taken for granted that the people would just accept this as “par for the course”
HOLDING CURES FOR CANCERSPROSECUTION OF MINISTERS AND THEIR COHORTS IN PROFITEERING FROM CANNABIS AND OPIUM SALES
The 1939 cancer act was a criminal act when it was written and will be a criminal act until it is abolished, it promotes harmful radiation and refuses non evasive non-destructive cures for many kinds of ailments, including several of the 260 variations of the term “cancer”.
The drug minister has allowed licences to her own family members and others, to sell cannabis at over 5 times the street value, whilst all along refusing those cures to the people of our nation under the maintenance that cannabis is dangerous and does NOT cure cancers.
The destruction of the hemp industry for the synthetic oil industry and the removal of the cures for many illnesses with cannabis oils for the radium and pharmaceutical industries was deliberate and criminal in intent, it removed hemp for plastic and cannabis oils for radiation.
The abolition of the 1939 cancer act, the decriminalisation of recreational cannabis and the resurgence of the hemp industry would not only assist in policing resources going where needed but it would reduce the reliance on plastics by massive amounts.
Whilst this is the most horrendous act of parliament to be written by “honourable” politicians imaginable, it was imagined and maintained as well as profited from.
The planting of hemp has been proven to reduce toxins in the ground such as radiation, not to use such a resource is criminal in itself considering the benefits this one particular plant has across the board, but our politicians hold this and profit from the sale of cannabis to the tune of 600 million pounds a year, but this is accepted as “just par for the course”.
THE CORRUPTION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT TO PROTECT THE UPPER ECHELONS
When parliament got hold of the human rights agreement that agreement said it would be a criminal offence for anyone to abuse the human rights of another human being, when our own politicians got it the replaced the word criminal with civil, this reduced the offence of human rights violations to CIVIL offences and not prosecutable under the criminal justice act.
The people were conned into believing they have rights, but those rights can not be enforced and will not be honoured by parliamentarians, the proof being in the DWP deaths, collective austerity and collective punishment for the actions of the bankers.Forced austerity and poverty as well as the violations committed by our own representatives makes the human rights act a pointless exercise as the police, who swear an oath to protect YOUR human rights, are not allowed to get involved in CIVIL issues of human rights abuses by parliament.
Our own politicians tell us we are protected with human rights, the police swear an oath to protect those rights and our politicians legislate to stop the police enforcing the human rights act on to parliament, as one can see, “just par for the course”.
OGP will retrospectively criminalise human rights violations by state apparatus such as the DWP and Parliament and take criminal actions to ensure justice is served to the victims of the last 20 years of collective criminality from parliamentarians.
UNIVERSAL LAW AND THE ABOLITION OF LEGALSES IN LAW
The biggest division maker in our four nations is law, religious law, criminal law, civil law, country law, etc, this is designed to confuse, this is compounded with the use of an alien language called legalese, this language is inherently deceptive as any statement has several meanings.
The use of our national recognised languages in our courts makes a level plain for the accused as they would understand the language the court is using.Legalese is not English and is not taught in our education system even though it governs our every law.
The translation of our laws into legalese from English should not be necessary, but its “par for the course”ABUSE OF OFFICEFrom tax havens to false claims and general dishonesty in parliamentarian ranks, our legal system has failed to make politicians and the upper echelons accountable for their actions under criminal law, the same laws that would have another person in jail for a fraction of the offence.
This is not accidental that our upper echelons are outside of the law, privateering, although technically illegal, is commonplace in the sale of the NHS to friends and colleagues of minsters etc, the criminality is blatant, but again, we accept this as just par for the course.
This is nothing less than criminal governance geared for the wealthy and those using our authority to abuse their position and profit from our suffering, this kind of behaviours can no longer be view as “just par for the course ” when our nation is being hurt by our own upper echelons who do these things and those who just sit back and allow such things as mass child abuse in their OWN ranks.
THE ABUSE OF PRESUMED CONSENT
With many issues such as genderism, gender fluidity and transism the state has taken the consent of parents away from them and teaching children about these issues BEFORE teaching our children their actual gender.
Children are being forced to contemplate their gender as young as 5, the issue that they may not even be a gender or may be another gender is being contemplate by infants, before many of these infants know how to tell the time on a clock.
The contemplation of gender and infants is child abuse, children have a right to be who they are before being forced to contemplate they may be something else, this is psychological child abuse with proven failed experiments on gender fluidity and genderism which has been discredited by the vast majority of the medical as well as the psychological industry, the people profiting are the drug industry and the psychiatric industry.
OGP will halt all gender related experiments in schools and on children until a national debate is had on the issue of gender and the realities and practicalities of gender fluidity and the teaching of this to children, without the consent of the parents.
There are many laws to protect children, but no laws to protect children from politically driven issues such as this genderism.The sovereignty of parents must be restored without debate.
POLICING BY COMMON CONSENT
The OGP will nationalise all outsourced policing, the removal of the consent of the people to be consulted before the privatisation of policing was political and put the policing of our country directly in the hands of politicians, even criminality such as extortion is now being allowed because politicians declared it a civil offence.
Websites are replacing police officers, police officers are being used to protect “national assets” such as fracking and cannabis fields owned by the drug ministers husband, its an abuse of our policing when knife crime is on the rise that officers are protecting drug fields and criminal gangs of child abusers in authority.
Politicians removed themselves from policing when they used the official secrets act to protect criminals and the violation of children past, present and future.
SOVEREIGNTYSOVEREIGNTY OF THE INDIVIDUAL, SOVEREIGNTY OF THE STATE AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE CROWN
Each individual person irrespective of colour of religion IS a sovereign, a sovereign of their own decisions, the most important of those decisions is the right to say no.The sovereignty of “you” is a birth right, the sovereignty to prosper under one’s own merit, to self defence and to the right to be at peace and not at odds with those professing your representation, if you should choses someone to represent you.The sovereignty of the individual to be governed by their own conscience is a fundamental inherent birth right.
This was removed with the concept of royalty and the concept of “representation by…” both concepts were built by people who would profit from the “many” under the protection of the “few”, we now call this “the crown and state”.Royalty is a claim on your personal sovereignty by Elizabeth Windsor personally.
This claim is a claim based solely on imposed law and the “word” of religious fundamentalists; these religious fundamentalists imposed the client kings of Rome on our nation until henry VIII imposed his personal religious fundamentalism on to these nations.
There is no proof of this claim to YOUR sovereignty by Elizabeth Windsor being divine allowances or even moral and without real proof this must be challenged by, no person owns the sovereignty of another person or that persons family and conscience.
Politicians are attempting to make civil responsibility part of your rights, rights are not for politicians to take or give, this is nothing more than criminal subjugation through law.
The OGP will reformat the human right act to a criminal act and not a civil act.When politicians and our “”peers”” got the human rights act they removed the word criminal and replaced it with civil, this was fraud, because it was not explained to the people that their human rights by definition would be civil issues if abused and not criminal offences.
This one act alone put politicians above the human rights of the people they have abused with forced austerity.Politicians or peers who abuse the human rights of the people they represent will be treated under criminal law and not civil law.
This will retrospectively cover the years from 2000 to the date of enactment.The sovereignty and the inherent rights of the individual is not for any human being or establishment to own, neither under the auspice of divine agreement or political subjugation.James Anderson. https://www.facebook.com/groups/2049620155340028