THE FALLACY OF FREEDOM AND THE REALITY OF ARGUMENTATIVE REPRESENTATION
There are several historical meanings to the word politics including blood sucking ticks, the reality is politics is the word to argue.
Politics is not a party, it’s not an ideology, its not even a theology, politics is to argue, it’s the battle of the argument not the content of the argument, politics is the fighting of the argument in itself.
These people you vote for and are professing to be political representatives are argumentative’s and have created careers out of this, it is called political representation, argumentative representation.
Argumentative representation needs a cover to show the people or these people would be found out for what they are, arugmentative’s who are out solely for themselves, so we have the creation of ideologies these people hide behind, political ideologies etc.
Argumentative ideologies by definition can never be stable, each ideology wants to be the one at the top, the one in charge, this in turn brings the true character of an argumentative into full bloom, the viciousness of “I am in charge, and you do as I tell you”.
This pandemic has shown us that all political parties will sing from the same sheet if they need too, the arguments stop, yet at any other time they just won’t.
The same can be said as to the last two world wars and the last 20 years of constant war, when our politicians’ futures are under threat they will join together for their greater good.
Definitely not the greater good of the people as many of the people represented end up dead, by their own representatives’ policies.
Let’s look at universal credit, these policies have caused the death of over 300,000 people so far, the last two years deaths because of universal credit will all be recorded as covid deaths no doubt, but the fact remain, “political policies” are killing our people, that is not the job of any representative, political or otherwise to harm those they represent.
As a people we need to redefine our meaning of representation and clarify to those who we choose to govern us as a people the understanding of how we are to be governed, this argumentative political governance needs to end.
Two thousand years of this kind of governance has brought ordinary people very little as politicians and their ilk become billionaires and “powerful” people, this in turn brings privileges of power, tax havens, shares in cannabis factories under licences to friends and family, untold profits over this pandemic amounting to in excess of 35 billion whittled into politicians and scientists’ pockets.
Even a pub landlord made a fortune from our political representatives during this “pandemic”, one can have decades of child rape and abuse covered up, family inheritance looked after, shares in vaccine companies, open test and trace companies that don’t really work at all, there are a lot of things politicians and their masters get as rewards for what they do, honours, titles, wealth and “power” so representing you would be counterproductive.
We need a buffer between our representatives’ ideologies, their authority to do and accountability but especially for the consequences of their policies, we need protection from our own politicians, from our own arugmentative’s.
The objective governance party has one main objective, to have a house of representatives built on behalf of the people, in this house will sit 500 individuals, each chosen from the electoral list as with crown court juries, these people are a true representation of “our” people.
The house will be the conscience of our nation and protectors of our freedom, our liberties and our rights, these people will have the authority to say not to politicians before they deliberately harm our people.
Politicians will no longer be “governed” by politicians and investigations, but under the same criminal laws as the people of our nation, the house will have final authority of any laws that effect the wellbeing of our people present and future.
For example, Universal credit would have been rejected as harmful to the people, as would these emergency powers covering this rebranding of the common flu for a deliberate pandemic emergency.
The banking crisis that was two mass defrauding cases and multi billion pounds of theft and deceptions would not have been rebranded as miss selling and a crisis.
The child abuse epidemic in our upper echelons would be dealt with as criminal offences against children and not dirty secrets to hide under the official secrets act for a hundred years.
Our people need to be protected from our politicians first, especially the elderly and disabled, they have deemed as eligible for a DNR when they enter a hospital, it they have complications in hospital and have the virus, vaccinated or not they are not to be resuscitated even if they can be resuscitated.
Do you not think these people deserve to live?
Why have politicians done this, we are told it is to save beds in the NHS.
A bed and a life, is a life less deserving?
This is the freedom we give to political representatives, the freedom to decide who lives and who dies and look what they have done with it throughout history.
We can take that final authority from their hands with a house of representatives to govern those we choose to represent our political ideologies.
We can have objective governance with a house of representatives as they would have a non-politicised objectivity, our people know what is right and what is not, politicians and their peers do what they want irrespective of right or wrong.
A house of representatives would be representative of the people’s conscience and with civil and criminal authority over our political representatives we can have some form of stability of ideological political representation because of the finality of the people’s voice from a house of representatives.
James anderson
CITIZENS GUARD 